# How Fast Would NASCAR Cars Go at Daytona without Restrictor Plates?

Doug Yates was Â guest on Dave Moody’s SiriusXM Speedway last week. He brought up a conversion you hear a lot in the week before Daytona and Talladega. Â Every 25 horsepower in the engine translates to about a 1 second decrease in lap times. Dave did the math: Removing the plates would increase theÂ engine by 450 horsepower. Four hundred and fiftyÂ more horsepower equates to 18 seconds off the lap time, assuming all other things equal. Â That last part was a very importantÂ qualification. It will come back to haunt us in a moment.

David GillilandÂ got the pole at Daytona with a lap speed of 45.153 seconds, translating to a speed of 199.322 miles per hour. Using the above argument, his lap time would decrease to 27.153 seconds. Â That translates to a speed of 331.456 mph.In 2004, Rusty Wallace ran 228 mph at Talladega in an unrestricted engine. That’s almost 100 mph slower than our theoretical max speed. Let’s ignore the concerns that NASCAR racecars tend to get aerodynamically unstable if they turn around at high speeds and think only about straight line speed.

So let’s look at whatÂ limits how fast a car can go. Â We’re considering two major forces: the force the engine makes, which propels the car forward, and the drag force, which pushes the car backward.

It’s exactly like a tug of war. Which ever is pulling harder, that’s the direct the car is going to go. (That’s because force is, as your physical teacher no doubt repeated over and over, a vector.At most tracks, if you want to pass someone, you step on the gas, theÂ engine produces more force and you accelerate. Â Daytona and Talladega are unique in that engine power is limited to about 450 hp. The pedals on the floor the whole way around. You’re perennially in the last situation, in which the car moves at a constant (a terminal) speed, which is the fastest speed you can get. The engine is doing all it can.

So here’s the catch – the reason why the phrase “all other things equal” causes problems. Â All other things are not equal. Specifically, drag. Drag is simply the force of the air molecules pushing on the car, but that force increases quadratically,Â just like downforce. If the car goes twice as fast, you get four time (two squared) the drag. Â It’s not fair: you have to work four times harder to get twice as fast. But that’s physics for you.

The argument above relied on the assumption that the drag remained constant – and it definitely doesn’t. It gets worse, because power depends onÂ velocity cubed. So to go twice as fast, you haveÂ to overcome four times as much drag and you need eight times (2x2x2) the power.

You canÂ estimate the terminal velocity of a racecar using some simple physics. The terminal velocity is the ratio of the power (P) to the drag (D):

The maximum drag you can have is proportional to the terminal velocity squared:

Which means that the terminal velocity ends up depending on the cube root of the power!

If the power of an engineÂ doubles, the terminal velocity only increases by the cube root of two, which is 1.26. If we takeÂ 200 mph as a nice round terminal velocity for a restricted engine, removing the plates and doubling the engine power to 900 hp would only increase the terminal velocity for the unrestricted engine to 252 mph. Â That’s pretty surprising – you double the engine power and you only get 50 mph more. Â Such is theÂ powerÂ of cube roots.

If nature were linear, it would be a whole lot lessÂ interesting.

Many thanks to my friends Josh Browne and Andy Randolph, both excellent engineersÂ and always willing to let me bounce ideas off them and verify that I’m not crazy. Â Not, at least, when it comes to physics.

The Physics of NASCAR is 15 years old. One component in getting a book deal is a healthy subscriber list. I promise not to send more than two emails per month and will never sell your information to anyone.

1. Quote of the Year: If nature were linear, it would be a whole lot less interesting.

I remember attempting to audio-record an unamplified speech long ago. We moved up “1 row” and my buddy, who was taking a physics class at the time, laughed at my thinking this would help. He then explained the formula was something like the square, maybe cube, root of the distance. Moving up 4′ increased the volume my recorder received by like a tenth of a decibel. Same basic logic applies here.

• Thanks for the comment, Caleb. If it weren’t for the 1/r^squared law, the world would not only be less interesting, it might be a whole lot louder, too!

2. J.R. says:

FAST AS SH%T….HOLD ON, PULL THEM BELTS TIGHTER, SO THEY SQUEEZE YOUR, OOPS, CAN’T SAY THAT ….. BE NICE NOW.

3. J.R. says:

No matter how it’s stated, 225 plus is moving right along, gotta be a thrill, until ya hit something, then it’s well, that was fun….provided ya live ta talk about it.

4. MikeMasher1000 says:

This is very good, I love this cite!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.