My Kansas Predictions Revisited

Over on NBC Sports, I made Kansas predictions using only 2022 data.

A table comparing my predictions with the results for the fall Kansas race

So here’s a table comparing my algorithm’s prediction in the leftmost columns and drivers’ actual finish positions in the right.

I colored my Kansas predictions for 1-10 green, and did the same for the actual finishing positions. I repeated the process with yellow for positions 11-20.

I didn’t include some drivers in my prediction because I didn’t have enough data for them. (That’s Ty Gibbs, Noah Gragson, etc.)

How’d I do?

Much to my surprise, eight out of the 10 drivers who rose to the top in my algorithm finished in the top 10. The two who didn’t — Kyle Busch and Kevin Harvick — had problems that put them either out of the race or well back in the field.

It was a very simple algorithm that weighted drivers’ finishes this year at Kansas, Las Vegas and Michigan. I modified that with a factor that took the driver’s last five finishes into account.

So pretty good results for a really, really basic algorithm.

My attempt to predict who the first four drivers out would be will be far less successful.

Please help me publish my next book!

The Physics of NASCAR is 15 years old. One component in getting a book deal is a healthy subscriber list. I promise not to send more than two emails per month and will never sell your information to anyone.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.